SAH icon
A New Look is Coming Soon
StatisticsAssignmentHelp.com is improving its website with a more improved User Interface and Functions
 +1 (315) 557-6473 

Assignment Solution: Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoL) Factor Analysis

The exploration of work-related well-being is a critical aspect of understanding the modern workplace environment. In pursuit of this understanding, the present study delves into the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoL) through a rigorous factor analysis approach. The overarching hypothesis, denoted as H1, forms the cornerstone of this investigation, aiming to unravel the latent factors inherent in the WRQoL. This hypothesis sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the intricate dimensions that contribute to the overall quality of life experienced by individuals in their professional settings.

Problem Description:

The Factor Analysis assignment aimed to uncover the underlying factors or sub-dimensions within the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoL). Employing common factor analysis using principal axis factoring with Promax rotation in SPSS version 26, the study sought to derive meaningful dimensions that contribute to the overall assessment of work-related quality of life.

Factor Analysis Results:

Table 1: Common Factor Loading – Principal Axis Factoring (Promax Rotation)

F1: GWB F2: JCS F3: CAW F4: HWI F5: SAW F6: WCS
Q_2 I feel able to voice opinions and influence changes in my area of work (CAW) 0.526
Q_4 I feel well at the moment (GWB) 0.602
Q_5 My employer provides adequate facilities and flexibility for me to fit work in around my family life (HWI) 0.906
Q_6 My current working hours/ patterns suit my personal circumstances (HWI) 0.547
Q_7_r I often feel under pressure at work (SAW) 0.727
Q_8 When I have done a good job it is acknowledged by my line manager (JCS) 0.608
Q_9_r Recently, I have been feeling unhappy and depressed (GWB) 0.661
Q_10 I am satisfied with my life (GWB) 0.869
Q_11 I am encouraged to develop new skills (JCS) 0.807
Q_12 I am involved in decisions that affect me in my own area of work (CAW) 0.763
Q_14 My line manager actively promotes flexible working hours /patterns (HWI) 0.602
Q_15 In most ways my life is close to ideal (GWB) 0.740
Q_16 I work in a safe environment (WCS) 0.721
Q_18 I am satisfied with the career opportunities available for me here (JCS) 0.449
Q_19_r I often feel excessive levels of stress at work (SAW) 0.827
Q_20 I am satisfied with the training I receive in order to perform my present job (JCS) 0.361
Q_21 Recently, I have been feeling reasonably happy all things considered (GWB) 0.755
Q_22 The working conditions are satisfactory (WCS) 0.786
Q_23 I am involved in decisions that affect members of the public in my own area of work (CAW) 0.668

Factor Descriptions:

Factor 1: General Well-Being (GWB)

  • Extracted with five items, this factor focuses on happiness and life satisfaction.
  • Reliability value: 0.849.
  • Example: "I am satisfied with my life."

Factor 2: Job and Career Satisfaction (JCS)

  • Extracted with four items, this factor delves into employee satisfaction with job and career.
  • Reliability value: 0.784.
  • Example: "When I have done a good job, it is acknowledged by my line manager."

Factor 3: Control at Work (CAW)

  • Extracted with three items, this factor addresses the ability to influence changes in the work area.
  • Reliability value: 0.758.
  • Example: "I feel able to voice opinions and influence changes in my area of work."

Factor 4: Home-Work Interface (HWI)

  • Extracted with three items, this factor explores the balance between work and personal life.
  • Reliability value: 0.780.
  • Example: "My employer provides adequate facilities and flexibility for me to fit work in around my family life."

Factor 5: Stress at Work (SAW)

  • Extracted with three items, this factor relates to pressure and stress experienced at work.
  • Reliability value: 0.738.
  • Example: "I often feel excessive levels of stress at work."

Factor 6: Working Conditions (WCS)

  • Extracted with three items, this factor gauges satisfaction with working conditions and environment.
  • Reliability value: 0.769.
  • Example: "The working conditions are satisfactory."

Conclusion:

By employing principal axis factoring with Promax rotation, the study successfully identified and described six factors within the WRQoL scale, shedding light on different aspects contributing to an individual's work-related quality of life. The reliability values for each factor indicate the internal consistency and robustness of the identified dimensions.